Everybody.
So the writing section just like the reading section now has graphs within them and you know if you're
comfortable with graphs reading the Xs and understanding then it shouldn't be that hard but just in
case you're not going to go over how to interpret graphs really clearly and effectively in this last
graphs are pretty easy to read.
But if you're not comfortable reading them it's only because you haven't had enough practice and you
should go through these three steps first is always read the title they'll give you clues to what the
graph is showing you then establish which variables each axis represents.
Finally determine the relationship between variables on the accesories for each entity.
The question asks at this point the writer wants to add specific information that supports the main
topic of the paragraph.
So he defined two things and he defined the specific information that's true.
And they need to find some that supports the main topic.
Ok so which of these is relevant and accurate.
Let's check the first one.
The first one said that 64 percent of respondents noted that co-working spaces prevented them from completing
tasks in a given time.
Let's use our method on the graph to make sure we understand it.
Step 1 read the title.
Perceived effective coworking unbusiness skills.
So what effect does Koki have on O.
He's the y axis.
Looks like the business skills otherwise axes the different kinds of skills.
That means the axes must be the perceived defect.
So here we have the perceived defect 2% 74 percent.
But what does that mean.
It doesn't make sense to me.
How can 74 percent be an effect.
Ah.
When I look at the NATCA the dark color is the positive impact of 74 percent thought it had a positive
impact whereas 2 percent thought it had a negative impact.
So let's go through ABC and then see which of these is accurate.
And then we check for relevance.
A said 64 percent thought that prevented them from completing tasks in a given time.
He has completed Torsten the given time 64 percent there but 64 percent think it's positive.
And I see here that it prevented that.
That's negative.
So he's actually opposite.
The graph shows me B says that 71 percent of respondents indicated that using a coworking space increase
their creativity.
Well that's positive.
Increasing creativity his creativity his 71 percent works.
It's accurate he says.
Respondents credited coworking spaces with giving them Seventy four percent of their ideas related to
business or his ideas related to business and crediting the co-working spaces with that is definitely
positive.
And the numbers 74 percent to see is also accurate says respondents revealed that their ability to focus
on their work improved by 12 percent in a co-working space while their ability to focus is right here.
And it's saying that it improved.
Yet I see that it's a negative thing that was top percent and to be honest it's not even clear whether
the their their focus decreased by tops and it's 2 percent of respondents.
But either way we know that's not the right answer right copyright.
So BNZ we're left with which of these is relevant what's the point of the paragraph.
What most caught my interest was a quotation from someone who described coworking spaces as melting
pots of creativity creativity and has been given straightfoward.
All right.
Next one let's start the graph this time let's read the graph first.
Step 1 read the title average daily high and low temperature recorded at neuk weather station in Greenland
from this period to this period.
OK so it's the average and I see of course on the y axis is the temperature and I see on the x axis
is time the different months.
So these must be the entities I see the average daily high in a given month.
And the average daily low in a given month on a given date.
All right.
Now that I understand the graph.
What's the question asking.
Which choice most accurately and effectively represents information that graph.
So basically when it wants accurate while the sentence says it's a long one but basically the size of
the ice sheet fuckwitt seasonally in summer the average daily high temperatures in Greenland can rise
to a slightly above 50 degrees Fahrenheit partly noting the ice in the winter.
The sheet thickens at the additional snow falls an average daily low temperatures can drop too.
So I want to describe average daily low temperatures in the winter while the winter starts in December
right like December I guess to bad.
Technically So I guess it drops as low as you know around 12 degrees or so.
It drops as low as 20 degrees but it definitely goes lower than that.
It's below 20 for sure right pieces to 12 degrees Fahrenheit.
I mean it looks like 12 degrees outside in February so maybe not in the winter.
But it's not that far off it's pretty close.
Ceases to their lowest point in December 13th or December 13th is this line right here.
But that's well above top degrees.
That's definitely not true that it's the lowest point
D to 10 degrees Fahrenheit and stay there for months then drop 10 degrees and stay there for months.
No it did not.
So although I can't precisely say that it's Toftrees the other choices are just totally off and kind
of right.
It looks roughly right for a graph.
So that's going to be my answer right there.
Be it for grass remember Read the title establish which variables each axis represents.
You know understand what the graph shows you and more importantly the third step.
You've got to understand what's actually being graphed what what are the entities and what's the relationship
being shown between those two variables.
For example a nice easy one would be think about your classmates and you know everyone has a certain
height and everyone has its own weight.
Well use weight as the y axes and height as the x axis perhaps.
Right.
And every entity would be a different person to class and you might spot a point on that graph to show
where everyone is.
Hope that helps.
Grass is fairly straightforward used to practice a little bit and you'll find you get these questions
right.
Every single time.